Abstract
Chromatographic peak detectors return binary decisions, even though smoothing, local noise, signal overlap, and parameter choices can affect the outcomes. This sensitivity complicates interpretation and may encourage over-reliance on automation. We present Peak-a-boo, an uncertainty-aware visual analytics workbench that combines segment-dependent detection with evidence for detectability, perturbation stability, reference correspondence, and provenance in a review and audit workflow. On six synthetic chromatograms with 84 reference intervals, segment-dependent filtering removed 23.4% of unsupported detections while retaining all supported peaks. Across 105 parameter configurations, the best setting achieved F₁ = 0.950, and detectability separated supported from unsupported candidates more clearly than stability. Peak-a-boo demonstrates how complementary algorithmic evidence can support the review of uncertain scientific detections.
