IEEE VIS 2025 Content: StressDiffVis: Visual Analytics for Multi-Model Stress Comparison

StressDiffVis: Visual Analytics for Multi-Model Stress Comparison

Jiabao Huang -

Zikun Deng -

Hanlin Song -

Xiang Chen -

Shaowu Gao -

Yi Cai -

Image not found
This paper is relevant to structural engineers, CAE practitioners, and simulation scientists involved in iterative design and stress analysis. StressDiffVis enables efficient comparison of stress distributions across multiple design alternatives through volumetric visualization and matrix-based comparison. These techniques may also inspire applications in other domains, such as fluid dynamics and electromagnetic field studies, where comparing model variants is essential.
Keywords

Stress analysis, comparative visualization, volume visualization

Abstract

Structural analysis is essential in modern industrial design, where engineers iteratively refine geometry models based on stress simulations to achieve optimized designs. However, comparing stress distributions across multiple model variants remains challenging due to the complexity of stress fields, which are high-dimensional, unevenly distributed, and dependent on intricate geometric structures. Existing tools primarily support single-model analysis and lack dedicated functionalities for multi-model comparison. As a result, engineers must rely on manual, cognitively demanding visual inspections, making it difficult to systematically identify and interpret stress variations across design iterations. To address these limitations, we propose StressDiffVis, a visual analytics approach that facilitates stress field comparison across multiple structural models. StressDiffVis employs a volumetric representation to encode stress distributions while minimizing occlusion, enabling voxel-wise difference analysis for model comparison. To support localized analysis, we introduce model segmentation, grouping voxels with similar stress patterns across models. StressDiffVis integrates these techniques into an interactive interface with a tree view, organizing models by the iterative design process, and a comparison view, using a matrix layout for detailed comparisons. We demonstrate the effectiveness of StressDiffVis through two case studies illustrating its utility in comparative stress analysis. In addition, expert interviews confirm its potential to enhance engineering workflows.